Et Tu Pizza Hut! Serves Chicken Pasta Instead Of A Vegetarian One–A Harried Consumer’s Tale.

Featured

complaint against Pizza Hut, Serves Chicken Pasta Instead Of A Vegetarian One

complaint against Pizza Hut, Serves Chicken Pasta Instead Of A Vegetarian One

And here come another veg/non-veg mix up!

This time is Pizza Hut!!!

Honestly, how difficult it is to distinguish a vegetarian serving from a non-vegetarian one?

Going by the rate at which this error is being repeated by the most reputed food chains in the country, it sure must take an Einstein to make the distinction. Us, lesser mortals, marking the distinction by looks and smell..tch!..only we knew the intricacies.

So this story comes straight from the non-veg heartland in the country-Kolkata. The heartland status notwithstanding, it is completely unjustified to shove non-vegetarian food down any vegetarian’s throat. The beliefs notwithstanding, it is a matter of respecting and upholding individual choices,

Pradeep Kumar, a consumer residing in Salt Lake City Kolkata had ordered a Veg Pasta at Salt Lake Pizza Hut. What he got instead was a Chicken Pasta, a mistake that could hardly be dismissed as a case of mixed boxes. To add on to the woes of the consumer, there was absolutely no response from the outlet when the consumer complained to them about the mix up. Nobody at the outlet as much as apologized for this blatant violation of their responsibility and duty as a respectable and reliable food chain.

As we have said earlier, oversights can be sometimes forgiven but deliberate disrespect of consumer’s grievances and rights can definitely neither be ignored nor be forgiven.

Pizza Hut! We really did expect better from you!

(Picture Credit: cyberrockk.com)

Beware! Did You Know The Truth Behind The Diwali Dhamaka Offers? A True Consumer Story.

Featured

Truth Behind The Diwali Dhamaka Offers--True Consumer Story

Truth Behind The Diwali Dhamaka Offers--True Consumer Story

Important: We are running this story as an illustration of the real ‘dhamaka‘ that lies behind the Diwali Dhamaka discounts and offers. Our only word of caution to every consumer waiting to avail the discount season–by all means go ahead…but do remember, its Diwali for the Brands too!

Tadka Take

Diwali Dhamaka!!!

Festive Season Discounts!

A look around and suddenly Diwali is a festival of discounts rather than lights.

Scores of middle class Indians eagerly await Diwali–not because they love the festival but because they want to adorn their house with Lakshmi’s latest luxury consorts–the LED TV that is up for grabs or that extra large refrigerator  designed to store humans.

But irrespective of the fact that the old television resembles a black and white antic, magically transforming every human form on screen into alien apparitions; irrespective of the fact that the attic storage is more functional than the old refrigerator and the table top is cooler than its freeze zone; the ‘mango’ junta waits and waits with patience that can put hermits in Himalayas to shame–for the festive season to arrive; the season when every coveted lifestyle adornment is suddenly so acquirable.

Every single Brand; every single showroom in the country is suddenly brimming with unfathomable generosity and for once consumer does feel like a king!

There is of course nothing wrong with this. The consumers get the best prices, excellent deals and Brands get business, loads of business. Its a symbiotic arrangement which works fine until the Brands are reasonably fair. See, we are very reasonable people. We don’t even demand absolute fair-play. We are happy so long as the game is ‘reasonable’. But even that seems humongous demand.

And so the consumers get lost in a maze of confusing terms, flashy ads and convenient fine prints. The end result is a consumer who feels that Diwali exploded right into his face and a Brand that laughs its way to the Bank.

Sridhar wrote to us with his story that is one of the typical cases of the consumer harassment that so frequently happens during the discount season. Below is his story in his own words.

Consumer Story

Like every typical middle class Indian consumers, I was also waiting for a festival season to buy home electronics to avail discounts and also lot of gifts. Was really happy to see Diwali celebration nearing and many shops have started Diwali offers for their consumers. On Nov 4th I went to SHAHS electronic stores at Chrompet area (@Chennai). Was very excited to see the LCD/LED/Plasma tv kept for display. Was very confused which TV to buy as all were so good at their point and unique features. But I finally settled with LG LED 42′ LS3400 series worth 50,000/-. The price was so high but still I could not resist myself from buying the TV (which definitely exceeded my budgets) through my HDFC credit card. As I was about to shift to new house on Dec1(and also did not want to loose this festive season purchase)), so I booked the TV and paid 50% of the price of 25000/- and agreed to pay the pending 25000/- this month end and get the product delivered.

On Nov 11th in TOI newspaper I see the SHAHS ad saying they give gifts worth 7990/- for consumers buying products worth Rs 50000/- or more(Have attached that ad in this mail). I was so happy to see this ad as I would be getting the gifts. My celebration time started. When I contact the SHAHS store where I bought the TV they said, the offer is applicable only for those consumers who bought more than one product worth Rs 50000/ or more and not for consumer who buy a single product worth Rs 50000 or more. I was shocked to hear this from the shop manager. I asked in return, why you are ignoring my gifts when you get the money 50000/- at the end of the day. WHy you focusiing on the no of products. You should concentrate on the Money and not the no of products consumer buy.

Just for cross checking I contacted OMR branch of SHAHS store and verified this gifts offer, they confirmed that this is applicable to even single LED TV also. And when I updated this news to the chrompet manager, he updates this to OMR store. Now the OMR store also ignoring their previous statements and saying the same stupid logic.

When I asked them why they did not mention this extra condition in the newspaper ad, they replied this ad will bring lot of customers to us. I was mentally affected by this statement from a responsible person.
I was totally shocked and was irritated that I bought a product from a fraud stores. I was completely upset to see they fooled me and also many more customers will be also fooled.

Tadka Take 2

Sridhar’s experience is by no means an isolated one. Nor is the tact to fool consumers by misguiding or confusing them a novelty. The trouble precipitates when the offers start getting dubious, advertising dodgy and fine print finer. This is the proverbial catch. If you are lucky, you will get past the festive season unscathed or with minor injuries. But if not, then your Diwali will be indeed ‘memorable’ but definitely not in a way you wish!

Picture Credit: auto.indiamart.com

Beware! Your Restaurant Is Over-Charging You! The Service Tax-Service Charge Mess.

Featured

Beware! Complaint Against Restaurant Charging Excessive Service Tax Wrongly!(Picture Credit:Legally India)

Beware! Complaint Against Restaurant Charging Excessive Service Tax Wrongly!(Picture Credit:Legally India)

Hard Rock Cafe and a bill of around 5K is hardly a surprise.

But it is, when you figure that around 1300 bucks of that meticulously crafted bill were wrongly charged!

When one of my friends came to this rude realization, he immediately dug out a post we had done ages ago (Read ‘Tax’ing-Decoding Your Restaurant Bill! ) on this issue along with a recent notice by Delhi High Court Bar Association (See picture, credit Legally India).

We have been crying hoarse for months now. But we will still refresh your memory so that at least next time when your restaurant overcharges you, you think twice before shelling out those hard earned bucks!

Service Tax is NEVER charged on the whole amount of the bill. It is only charged on the service component of bill which the Finance Ministry has pegged at 40% of the invoice amount. Thus, as per Finance Ministry stipulations,  the service tax is to be charged ONLY on 40% of the invoice amount (excluding the VAT charges). Therefore, the effective service tax becomes around 4% of your invoice. (percentage updated as per latest Finance Ministry notification)

Decoding Your Restaurant Bill!

Decoding Your Restaurant Bill!

This is more or less what Delhi High Court Bar Association has also told its members albeit with a slight error. According to this notice, service tax is chargeable only on ‘service charge’ which is incorrect. Service tax is chargeable on the service component of the invoice, as pegged by the regulations.

What Bar Council has also not mentioned is that ‘service charge’ in itself is not a legal charge and is more of a discretionary thing. Which means that if you don’t like the restaurant’s services, you can refuse to pay the service charge.

It may or may not work, but it is worth a try. If it is actually a place which cares for its consumers (rare but such places do exist), they will oblige. (This only applies to objective customers who really have an issue with the services and definitely not the ones who believe in baseless tantrums. After all, as consumers, we too have a duty of care and a sense of responsibility which must be adhered to!)

Also, the ‘service tax’ is charged as per ministry guidelines on a percentage of the invoice as determined by ministry regulations. No restaurant can actually vary this component at will, not at least to the disadvantage of the consumers.

If your restaurant is charging  service tax on the entire invoice or bill amount, PROTEST and DON’T PAY. This is a seriously disturbing trend, an outright violation of not only consumer rights but the regulations laid down by the concerned authorities and needs to be curbed.

And the ones who can actually really and truly impose an effective curb on the practice, are aware, vigilant and pro-active consumers!

 

 

 

Beware! Your Vegetarian Pizza May Have A Non-Veg Topping. A Harassed Consumer Crusades Against Domino’s.

Featured

Complaint Against Domino's, Non Veg Tacos Served Instead Of Veg In Vadodara, Consumer wants 5L compensation

Complaint Against Domino's, Non Veg Tacos Served Instead Of Veg In Vadodara, Consumer wants 5L compensation

Veg or Non-Veg?

In a world where food choices are getting complex, being vegan is the new fad. For the uninitiated, vegan is the trendy term for good, old vegetarianism, albeit with some mind-boggling complications. (We have heard that a section vegans subscribe to the theory where all dairy products are deemed non-vegan, in effect implying that my glass of milk is actually a glass of liquid meat or something to that effect!).

Nevertheless, most of us India continue to remain unaware of the rapidly evolving world of gastronomy, and continue to divide our world food in good old fashioned way–vegetarians and non-vegetarians. (There is another category of convenience–eggetarians. This category basically comprises of that confused bunch of individuals who are unable to decide whether their love for eggs is greater than or lesser than their allegiance to vegetarianism. And while they decide, they sit over the fence..err..egg.)

We are simple people and it is really hard to get our choices wrong. We don’t have complicated considerations. If we are veg, we stick to anything that logically falls into the category–vegetables, fruits, cereals and likewise. We don’t make confusing inclusion or exclusions.

Atleast in this part of the World, distinguishing between veg and non-veg was no rocket science. Or so we thought.

But Brands  O Brands, you are on a relentless quest to prove us wrong…every single time!

This time, it is Domino’s. When Hitesh Tejani from Vadodara approached us with this issue, we were bemused. A simple order of Veg Tacos placed at Ellora Park branch of Domino’s in Vadodara magically morphed into Non-Veg Tacos at the time of delivery.

Complaint Against Domino's, Non Veg Tacos Served Instead Of Veg In Vadodara

Complaint Against Domino's, Non Veg Tacos Served Instead Of Veg In Vadodara

How did the mix-up happen, we are at loss.Especially, when a reputed and globally trusted Brand like Domino’s was on the other end. How on earth can they mix up vegetarian and non-vegetarian orders when they are supposed to be packed in boxes with distinct marking in green (for veg) and red (for non-veg). It really cannot be passed as a human oversight for a business to which this distinction is fundamental. It is an example of callousness in the extreme and a minor manifestation of the extent to which consumers are taken for granted by Brands in India.

The cherry on the top, so to say, on this disaster sundae is a complete absence of any remorse or attempts to rectify on part of the erring Brand. As we have always maintained, we can find it in our hearts to let go of the actual fault, but what makes the issue unforgiveable is an unresponsive, unsympathetic customer care, when approached for redressal.

Food business is serious business. Not just basic hygiene and health of the consumers is at stake, but sometimes even the sensibilities, religious or otherwise are closely woven in. We are not concerned with the ethical or moral debates around vegetarianism. But serving a professed vegetarian with non-veg food is definitely a disrespect of the consumer’s believes but also a blatant insult of his right to choice!

The least we can expect from Brands like Domino’s who have built empires around the loyalty of their consumers is–Respect.

Are you listening, Domino’s?

(Picture Credit: Stockwatch.in)

Check And Support This Spark-Domino’s should deliver tomato ketchup with its pizzal

http://spark.akosha.com/Domino’s-should-deliver-tomato-ketchup-with-its-pizza-id-32.html

Warning: Sony Xperia Ahead! Defective Handset And Harrowing Consumer Care-True Consumer Story.

Featured

Complaint against Sony Xperia defective handset network troubles

Complaint against Sony Xperia defective handset network troubles

Tadka Take

Unsympathetic customer services are the staple of this blog. I shudder at the thought–what would we do if we Brands across the country suddenly decided to start treating their consumers well!

Our selfish sadism aside, the frequency of instances of problematic customer care services is enough to drive anyone to outright paranoia. We really do have a hard time retaining our sanity!

A handset with network problems is a nothing short of a nightmare. And the harassment is beyond description when an unresponsive customer care compounds these troubles.

Here is Anshul’s story in his own words.

Consumer Story

This is regarding my phone Sony Xperia Sola which I had purchased on 6/6/2012 IMEI no. 352264051782338 which started giving network problem and hence I submitted my phone at Sony Service Centre Shadipur Delhi on 17th July 2012.

I was told that system wasn’t working so I was given an acknowledgement slip on A4 size paper with the stamp of the centre and was told the phone will be swapped within 10-15 days. After 10 days I called the customer care and I was shocked to know that according to their system my phone was submitted to them on 21 July (I had to suffer because of the callous behavior of the service centre). It is a shameful act as per the reputation of the brand SONY.

I did not get any call from the service centre at all regarding any information of my phone so I called the customer care again on 3rd august and I came to know that my phone was ready and that it has been there for 2-3 and they did not bother to call me. Not to forget I did not have any job sheet and the only thing which I had was a piece of A4 paper. When I asked them why I was not called they told me that my phone was not reachable which is hard to believe (reference no. 93421256 ).

I got my phone on Saturday i.e. 4 August which was replaced with new IMEI no 3522644057097736, the phone was tampered as the black sticker above the motherboard area was not properly fitted. The phone again started given the same problem with additional problem of wifi not working. Again I raised a complaint on 5th August 2012 ref no 93424365.

I had now submitted my phone again on 7th August to the service station and I was told the same thing that it will take 15 days to replace the phone and if I want my phone at earliest I should contact the customer care. As suggested by them I called the customer care on 9th August and I was denied a call transfer to the supervisor. The reference number for this is 93451222 and the person who attended the call was Dinesh (who was very rude) and said it’sthe policy and that nothing could be done and if you want to complaint regarding this I am free to do so.

This is not the end of the story as I got a red phone after replacement on 17/18 August instead of a black phone with scratches on it which I refused to accept and then I had a conference call with Mr. Danish, repair head Delhi, who through her associate mailed me that my phone will be replaced again with extended warranty till the time my phone was at service center.

scratched replaced phone given to me on 17.8.2012

scratched replaced phone given to me on 17.8.2012

I received my phone again on 25/08/2012 and it was shocking that this phone was still giving me the same problem and even after four replacements plus additional problem persisted and hence on 28/08/2012 I called them again and was shocked when i was on call with Assistant Manager who bluntly told that she cannot do anything and that I will have to go to the service center again.

This callous behavior is not acceptable that even after four replacements I am back to square one and I still have a defective phone with me which I haven’t resubmitted yet. I had to seek help from akosha.com who helped me contact the Sony people and on 4th September I got a call from the SERVICE REGIONAL HEAD of Delhi, Mr. Danish who told me that i have to submit my phone to the service centre(svc).As per the call on Tuesday(4.9.2012) Mr. Danish told me it’s a software related issue and will be resolved by going to the svc(the problem right now is same as it was with my new handset and on 17/7/2012 too they updated software and it didn’t work).

Still I had hopes and went to the svc on Thursday and it was closed and then I called Mr. Pradeep (Service centre head) on number 7827558388 and he told me he is in Faridabad and there was no one to open the svc and hence it is closed (just one member team for svc STRANGE!!!! they just closed the shop because there head was not there). Mr. Pradeep told me on phone that since the svc was closed he will send someone to pick my phone from my place and will get it done. On Saturday 8.9.2012.

I called him he said he will be sending someone but till 19:00 no one came and when I called him again he said no one was there and so he couldn’t come and didn’t even had the courtesy to call me to tell this and I told him to transfer my call which he refused.

I have taken almost every step which I could take, written several emails to them and also had made numerous call to the customer care but since my exams are approaching now I could not devote my time in going to the service centre again and again (which I was doing since 17/07/2012). I will be approaching the consumer forum as soon as possible but right now my concern is that I have a phone worth 18500 which is not working and they are not fixing it and not even replying to me.

Tadka Take 2

Multiple calls, rude representatives and harrowing routine is something most of our readers are pretty familiar with. But persisting issues in various hues despite multiple replacements and repairs is kind of extreme, that too for a Brand of the stature of Sony and a handset that costs somewhere around 20 grands.

Anshul’s story is a glimpse of the ugly end of the consumer-brand spectrum in the country. Unfortunately, from where we are looking, this seems to be the most prominent end. When reputed brands indulge in such callousness, it indeed signals ultimate consumer despair. But then, on second thought, it is the prominent brands that are most guilty of perpetrating such practices.

As far as Anshul’s ire is concerned, Sony, will you please pay heed!

 

 

Consumer Jugaad–Water Kingdom Charges 100 Bucks For Every Locker In Addition To Entry Fee. Is It Justified?

Water Kingdom Charges 100 Bucks For A Locker. Justified?

Water Kingdom Charges 100 Bucks For A Locker. Justified?

 

Important: The primary thought behind running this story is simple–if a consumer is irked enough to write to us, it is our duty to have him heard, the magnitude of the issue notwithstanding.

Water Kingdom Locker charges do not form a momentous concern but this is definitely a consumer issue, troubling a bunch of consumers out there. Are you one of them? Or do you think this is much ado about nothing? Comment and share your views.

We want to know, as does the rest of the consumer community! 

Tadka Take

Consumer Tadka’s Jugaad tipline is precisely for the kind of issues that do not really fit into any straightjacket, except for that one common denominator that they irk the consumers.

We had expected quirky stories and sure enough, we are rarely disappointed.

The latest quirk that irked a consumer originates at Water Kingdom.

A water park is one of the last places that should be a source of consumer issue. After all, these are the places meant to unwind and not wind up in frustration.

But, since, consumers are hardly ever spared, an irked consumer tipped us of a troublesome issue brewing in the kingdom.

Jugaad Tip

Here is what Anupam Singh wrote to us:

The locker rates at WATER KINGDOM are Rs 100/- which is too much when compared with the park entry rate i:e Rs 590/-. This is a complete injustice. A person going to the water park is bound to take a locker. The organization shouldn’t take undue advantage of the situation.

Instead of the Rs 100/- deposit, they should charge Rs 200/- refundable deposit and the locker charges should be reduced to Rs 30/- or Rs 40/-

After all nothing materialistic goes in renting a locker.

Tadka Take 2

100 bucks is not a lot of money. Yet if a charge which seems patently unjustified, it is an issue worth being raised. Lockers by definition are rented and hence, rental charges cannot be obviously done away with completely. But, whether the amount being charged is justified or not is an open question.

As far as we are concerned, Anupam’s concern seems justified to the extent that there is “nothing materialistic” in renting a locker. As far as the maintenance and other related charges are concerned, it is not entirely erroneous to deem it included in the hefty entry charges.

Even though we are inclined to hold the consumer right, we also agree that this is a fairly open ended concern. We are, therefore, happy to invite our reader’s views in this regard.

So what do YOU think? Are Water Kingdom locker charges justified?  Is it a pure gimmick to make more money? 

Comment and share your views. You are being heard!

(Picture Credit: Filmapia.com)